Lately, people are trying to develop more environmentally friendly fuels. Biofuels are fuels made out of organisms that have been genetically modified. We are performing a lab that will test the effectiveness of a certain biofuel. We are testing it by adding it to a strong base at various increments of time. The strong base will react with it and cause it to turn yellow, so, the more yellow the beaker the more energy is in that beaker. Depending on how long it takes to become a dark yellow we will know how effective this biofuel really is. Also on the second day, we will grind up a mushroom, a decomposer, and add it to the solution. This should speed up the reaction time because of its enzymes. Our group predicted that the amount of glucose in solution will increase until a certain point when the reaction will run out of reactants and stop.
Breaking down cellulose is fairly simple as demonstrated in these steps: First we add cellobiase to the cellulose which breaks apart the cellobiose that is made up of 2 glucose molecules. The 2 glucose molecules can then be used as fuel. We will be testing how efficient this reaction is. We will do this by adding .5 mL of the created solution to .5 Ml of p-nitrophenol which will stop the reaction and change the glucose to a yellow color allowing us to easily determine how much glucose has been produced.
The results of the reaction appear to prove our hypothesis. The solution appeared darker in the 2 minute tube than it was in the 1 minute tube. However, after that the increase in color was miniscule if there was any at all. This could be for two reasons, either we didn't add enough p-nitrophenol or the reaction had actually slowed to an almost complete stop.
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Precipitating DNA
DNA is a molecule that all living things have. It carries information for cells to perform the tasks that they are created for. DNA also carries genetic information which controls all a person's inherited traits such as height, eye color and hair color. 99.9% of every single person's DNA is exactly the same; the .1% difference is what makes every person different. The purpose of this lab is to precipitate our own DNA. Commercial uses of this type of lab could be to Study, compare, map or sequence DNA. It could even potentially be used in cloning.
The procedure of this lab is very simple. First we loosened cells on our cheeks by chewing them and then extracted them by rinsing our mouths with saline solution. Then we break open the cell walls with the lysis buffer which dissolves oil-based substances. Next, the protease is added, protease breaks down proteins. We destroy the proteins to destroy the enzyme, DNase, which digests DNA. Now the DNA can be precipitated without being destroyed by the DNase. DNA has a negative charge which would allow it to be soluble in water, so we add salt and the NA+ ions bond with the DNA neutralizing it. It will also allow the DNA to come together instead of repelling due to charges. Finally, cold ethanol is added which makes it even harder for the DNA to dissolve in the solution and the DNA will precipitate enough to be seen. Then we extracted the DNA from the solution and placed it in a necklace.
Our lab worked as it was supposed to and all of us had more than enough DNA in our test tubes. Due to our success we can assume that we did everything right, however, some possible things that could have gone wrong are: We could have not added enough protease and the DNase would have consumed all the DNA or we could have not harvested enough cells.
The procedure of this lab is very simple. First we loosened cells on our cheeks by chewing them and then extracted them by rinsing our mouths with saline solution. Then we break open the cell walls with the lysis buffer which dissolves oil-based substances. Next, the protease is added, protease breaks down proteins. We destroy the proteins to destroy the enzyme, DNase, which digests DNA. Now the DNA can be precipitated without being destroyed by the DNase. DNA has a negative charge which would allow it to be soluble in water, so we add salt and the NA+ ions bond with the DNA neutralizing it. It will also allow the DNA to come together instead of repelling due to charges. Finally, cold ethanol is added which makes it even harder for the DNA to dissolve in the solution and the DNA will precipitate enough to be seen. Then we extracted the DNA from the solution and placed it in a necklace.
Our lab worked as it was supposed to and all of us had more than enough DNA in our test tubes. Due to our success we can assume that we did everything right, however, some possible things that could have gone wrong are: We could have not added enough protease and the DNase would have consumed all the DNA or we could have not harvested enough cells.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
How Does Bacteria Taste?
Microorganisms have been around since the beginning of Earth, but we still have much to learn about them. However, we do know a few things about them. Most people associate bacteria with disease and infection, however only a very small percentage of bacteria can actually act as pathogens. Most bacteria are actually helpful to us as humans. That is why we hear about things like pro-biotics which promote the growth of so called "good" bacteria. A man named Koch developed a few postulates which are now used in modern day science in identifying bacteria and pathogens. We will test Koch's postulates by making yogurt, adding E. coli to some and Ampicillin to some and determining the outcome. We are also practicing how to handle microbes or our microbial technique such as using inoculating loops and agar plates.
We started with 4 tubes filled with milk and then we inoculated one with only yogurt bacteria, one with yogurt bacteria and ampicillin, one with E. coli and leaving only milk in one. We then left the tubes in an incubator overnight to allow the bacteria to grow. We predicted that the yogurt tube would be the only one with actual yogurt in it. We also hypothesized that the tube with yogurt and ampicillin in it would be milk, and that the tube with E. coli in it would be milk. The tube with only yogurt and milk did in fact end up as yogurt, while the tube with the ampicillin-yogurt mixture was more of a combination of yogurt and milk. We correctly hypothesized that the E. coli would end up as milk. The tube with E. coli ended up with a rancid smell, while the two tube with yogurt in them had a yogurt smell, and the milk tube smelled like spoiled milk. We then tested the pH of the tubes with Litmus paper they were all neutral except for the yogurt tube which was between 4 and 5.
The tube with only yogurt ended up as yogurt because it was the only addition to the milk in that tube. The tube with yogurt and ampicillin ended up as a mixture of milk and yogurt because the anti-biotic either didn't have enough time to eliminate all the yogurt bacteria or there was not a large enough amount of it to completely destroy the bacteria that was creating the yogurt. The E. coli tube ended up looking like milk and smelling very spoiled, this is because the bacteria multiplied overnight spoiling the milk. There were a few possible sources of error that could have altered our results, we could have used an inoculating loop that had been contaminated somehow, such as with the bleach that was being used. Another source of error could have been misreading the litmus paper. Also we could have not mixed the mixtures up enough with the vortex.
We started with 4 tubes filled with milk and then we inoculated one with only yogurt bacteria, one with yogurt bacteria and ampicillin, one with E. coli and leaving only milk in one. We then left the tubes in an incubator overnight to allow the bacteria to grow. We predicted that the yogurt tube would be the only one with actual yogurt in it. We also hypothesized that the tube with yogurt and ampicillin in it would be milk, and that the tube with E. coli in it would be milk. The tube with only yogurt and milk did in fact end up as yogurt, while the tube with the ampicillin-yogurt mixture was more of a combination of yogurt and milk. We correctly hypothesized that the E. coli would end up as milk. The tube with E. coli ended up with a rancid smell, while the two tube with yogurt in them had a yogurt smell, and the milk tube smelled like spoiled milk. We then tested the pH of the tubes with Litmus paper they were all neutral except for the yogurt tube which was between 4 and 5.
The tube with only yogurt ended up as yogurt because it was the only addition to the milk in that tube. The tube with yogurt and ampicillin ended up as a mixture of milk and yogurt because the anti-biotic either didn't have enough time to eliminate all the yogurt bacteria or there was not a large enough amount of it to completely destroy the bacteria that was creating the yogurt. The E. coli tube ended up looking like milk and smelling very spoiled, this is because the bacteria multiplied overnight spoiling the milk. There were a few possible sources of error that could have altered our results, we could have used an inoculating loop that had been contaminated somehow, such as with the bleach that was being used. Another source of error could have been misreading the litmus paper. Also we could have not mixed the mixtures up enough with the vortex.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)